<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A case study in executive stupidity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/</link>
	<description>FORTUNE&#039;s Stanley Bing shares his wit and wisdom every day with a blog, a career advice column, and special features like a gallery of Bullshit Jobs from his book 100 Bullshit Jobs ... and How to Get Them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:35:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyepatch, Broomfield, CO</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8315</link>
		<dc:creator>eyepatch, Broomfield, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8315</guid>
		<description>I saw Michael Eisner interview a Big 3 head (Chrysler/Dodge, I think)on Eisner&#039;s CNBC show. When Eisner asked how the company would compete with the Japanese hybrids, the guy - with a straight face, no less - described how they would take the &quot;fantastic&quot; multi-fuel engines they make for SUVs and put them into smaller cars over time. OVER TIME!!!??? Yes, the heads of America&#039;s Big 3 are so out of touch, they need help tying their own shoes. I&#039;ve owned one American car, three German, and two Japanese. I&#039;ll never buy American - ever - again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Michael Eisner interview a Big 3 head (Chrysler/Dodge, I think)on Eisner&#8217;s CNBC show. When Eisner asked how the company would compete with the Japanese hybrids, the guy &#8211; with a straight face, no less &#8211; described how they would take the &#8220;fantastic&#8221; multi-fuel engines they make for SUVs and put them into smaller cars over time. OVER TIME!!!??? Yes, the heads of America&#8217;s Big 3 are so out of touch, they need help tying their own shoes. I&#8217;ve owned one American car, three German, and two Japanese. I&#8217;ll never buy American &#8211; ever &#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen, Washington DC</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen, Washington DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8286</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;veblen&lt;b&gt;

Your added insight doesn&#039;t make me feel any more sympathetic to the workers. It is still a lot of money, and there are plently of folks who have neither insurance OR pensions included in their terms of employment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>veblen</b><b></p>
<p>Your added insight doesn&#8217;t make me feel any more sympathetic to the workers. It is still a lot of money, and there are plently of folks who have neither insurance OR pensions included in their terms of employment.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Boston,MA</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8281</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Boston,MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8281</guid>
		<description>Yes, they should have flown private.  

The &#039;Three&#039; arrived in Washington last week to plead their case for a strong future and their companies survival.

Would anyone in their right minds allow the airlines to fly these guys to the most important meeting of their lives?  A meeting that could affect millions of jobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they should have flown private.  </p>
<p>The &#8216;Three&#8217; arrived in Washington last week to plead their case for a strong future and their companies survival.</p>
<p>Would anyone in their right minds allow the airlines to fly these guys to the most important meeting of their lives?  A meeting that could affect millions of jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, MI</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>They thought Americans would continue to be stupid and take out 5 or 6 year loans on a car that runs out of warranty in 2 years and starts to fall apart immediately following.

 I have been burned buying a new &quot;big 3&quot; car twice, I sold the first at 6 months and the second one needed a transmission overhaul, cruise control broke and the A/C went out right after the 36,000 mile warranty expired. The ABS brakes quit twice (once in warranty and once right out of) and the battery completely crapped out just before the warranty expired. That was in 1998 and my last U.S. car.


I saw a special about GM on CNBC a couple months ago where a UAW worker explained how in the recent past; &quot;If buttons or knobs or whatever were missing that it was SOP to just ship the car&quot;, us stupid americans would take it because it was NOT Japanese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They thought Americans would continue to be stupid and take out 5 or 6 year loans on a car that runs out of warranty in 2 years and starts to fall apart immediately following.</p>
<p> I have been burned buying a new &#8220;big 3&#8243; car twice, I sold the first at 6 months and the second one needed a transmission overhaul, cruise control broke and the A/C went out right after the 36,000 mile warranty expired. The ABS brakes quit twice (once in warranty and once right out of) and the battery completely crapped out just before the warranty expired. That was in 1998 and my last U.S. car.</p>
<p>I saw a special about GM on CNBC a couple months ago where a UAW worker explained how in the recent past; &#8220;If buttons or knobs or whatever were missing that it was SOP to just ship the car&#8221;, us stupid americans would take it because it was NOT Japanese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian, MI</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8279</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian, MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8279</guid>
		<description>They make $32.15/hr plus benefits.

Still pretty damned good pay for an unskilled job anyone off the street could perform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They make $32.15/hr plus benefits.</p>
<p>Still pretty damned good pay for an unskilled job anyone off the street could perform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veblen, phoenix, arizona</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8270</link>
		<dc:creator>veblen, phoenix, arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8270</guid>
		<description>GM&#039;s &lt;b&gt;total labor costs&lt;/b&gt; -- current workers &lt;b&gt;plus&lt;/b&gt; pensions &lt;b&gt;plus&lt;/b&gt; health care for retirees -- divided by the number of current workers comes to $73 per current worker hour.

That&#039;s obviously &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; the same thing as current workers grossing $73 per hour.

It&#039;s a misleading statistic that certain folks have been pushing for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM&#8217;s <b>total labor costs</b> &#8212; current workers <b>plus</b> pensions <b>plus</b> health care for retirees &#8212; divided by the number of current workers comes to $73 per current worker hour.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s obviously <b>not</b> the same thing as current workers grossing $73 per hour.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a misleading statistic that certain folks have been pushing for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh, Huntsville, AL</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8269</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh, Huntsville, AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8269</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another tidbit.  I read in an article today that the average United Auto Workers employee makes $73 an hour, which equates to just over $150k a year.

I am an entry level aerospace engineer (rocket scientist), and I make just over 1/3 of that.  Seriously?  

Chapter 11 for the Big Three is the ONLY answer.  They need to get out of ridiculous labor contracts and start paying people what they are actually worth (a mere fraction of what they currently make).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another tidbit.  I read in an article today that the average United Auto Workers employee makes $73 an hour, which equates to just over $150k a year.</p>
<p>I am an entry level aerospace engineer (rocket scientist), and I make just over 1/3 of that.  Seriously?  </p>
<p>Chapter 11 for the Big Three is the ONLY answer.  They need to get out of ridiculous labor contracts and start paying people what they are actually worth (a mere fraction of what they currently make).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David, Los Angeles CA</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8268</link>
		<dc:creator>David, Los Angeles CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8268</guid>
		<description>Executives are paid big bucks to make big descisions.  Deciding their travel is usually done by someone else.  That being said...Yes, executives do lose touch with their employees, their customers and other executives as the descisions and stakes become greater.  The longer a company has been in business also contributes to entitlement and larger than life egos...most senior executives never see trouble coming because they don&#039;t know any better. However they rationalize it, taking a private jet was like taking a limo to pick up your welfare check...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Executives are paid big bucks to make big descisions.  Deciding their travel is usually done by someone else.  That being said&#8230;Yes, executives do lose touch with their employees, their customers and other executives as the descisions and stakes become greater.  The longer a company has been in business also contributes to entitlement and larger than life egos&#8230;most senior executives never see trouble coming because they don&#8217;t know any better. However they rationalize it, taking a private jet was like taking a limo to pick up your welfare check&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh, Huntsville, AL</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8264</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh, Huntsville, AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8264</guid>
		<description>These are the same companies who decided it would be best to continue trying to make record profits from SUV&#039;s and big trucks after gas prices skyrocketed.  When these big vehicles were popular, buying gas for them was hardly a concern in a family budget.  

Now, all they can do is beg for mercy while pleading the case that the world will end if we don&#039;t pay up.  I don&#039;t know about you, but I have no problem letting them go.  

As far as I can tell, the best thing they could have done for PR is to car pool to Washington in a Toyota Prius.  Then, they could at least try to make the case they aren&#039;t complete idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the same companies who decided it would be best to continue trying to make record profits from SUV&#8217;s and big trucks after gas prices skyrocketed.  When these big vehicles were popular, buying gas for them was hardly a concern in a family budget.  </p>
<p>Now, all they can do is beg for mercy while pleading the case that the world will end if we don&#8217;t pay up.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I have no problem letting them go.  </p>
<p>As far as I can tell, the best thing they could have done for PR is to car pool to Washington in a Toyota Prius.  Then, they could at least try to make the case they aren&#8217;t complete idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T, Jville, FL</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>T, Jville, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>I think the answer is that they didn&#039;t even think about it and they are really that out of touch.  

What&#039;s sad is that when (and I do think it is when and not if) the automakers get their share of the bailout, they&#039;ll do exactly as the banks have done with the money:  hoard it or use it to buy other companies and then lay off half their workforce to &quot;save money.&quot;  
So the taxpayers who ultimately fund these bailouts get the double shaft.  They get to see their hard-earned tax payer money go up in smoke AND lose their job.

Now that REALLY blows!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the answer is that they didn&#8217;t even think about it and they are really that out of touch.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s sad is that when (and I do think it is when and not if) the automakers get their share of the bailout, they&#8217;ll do exactly as the banks have done with the money:  hoard it or use it to buy other companies and then lay off half their workforce to &#8220;save money.&#8221;<br />
So the taxpayers who ultimately fund these bailouts get the double shaft.  They get to see their hard-earned tax payer money go up in smoke AND lose their job.</p>
<p>Now that REALLY blows!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty, Newington, CT</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8259</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty, Newington, CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8259</guid>
		<description>Not stupidity, just complete lack of common sense.  These muckety-mucks are just completely removed from the real world.  When was the last time they actually stepped in a grocery store, or pumped gas, or stood in line for a driver&#039;s lic?  They live in their ivory towers and are handed everything on a silver platter.  Not stupid, just completely out-of-touch.  With the billions given out to all these companies, congress could have given $10,000 to each and every taxpayer in America.  How many mortgage payments would that cover???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not stupidity, just complete lack of common sense.  These muckety-mucks are just completely removed from the real world.  When was the last time they actually stepped in a grocery store, or pumped gas, or stood in line for a driver&#8217;s lic?  They live in their ivory towers and are handed everything on a silver platter.  Not stupid, just completely out-of-touch.  With the billions given out to all these companies, congress could have given $10,000 to each and every taxpayer in America.  How many mortgage payments would that cover???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Mike, Houston TX</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Mike, Houston TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>Had they just been able to have an answer for the panel it would have been less of a shameful display. Silence was not golden in this case. They could have easily noted that security is paramount especially in troubling times like these. I refer to security of the execs AND the information they carry with them. 

I personally am not buying this whole we will run out of cash thing. GM is huge - they can shut down production to prevent spending cash as needed to live on. My take is they want to keep moving ahead business as usual and tap the tax payer for the right to do so. Come on Nardelli...you were almost in Jeff Immelt&#039;s seat (not that Jeff is setting th world on fire...just GE) can you not manage your statement of cash flows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had they just been able to have an answer for the panel it would have been less of a shameful display. Silence was not golden in this case. They could have easily noted that security is paramount especially in troubling times like these. I refer to security of the execs AND the information they carry with them. </p>
<p>I personally am not buying this whole we will run out of cash thing. GM is huge &#8211; they can shut down production to prevent spending cash as needed to live on. My take is they want to keep moving ahead business as usual and tap the tax payer for the right to do so. Come on Nardelli&#8230;you were almost in Jeff Immelt&#8217;s seat (not that Jeff is setting th world on fire&#8230;just GE) can you not manage your statement of cash flows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed, Montreal</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed, Montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>According to Aesop&#039;s &#039;The Ant and the Grasshopper,&#039; the grasshopper stuck to his dance and sing reflex until he went seeking a bailout. Sticking to it during the bailout request may indeed be breaking new ground.

It might be relevant to recall that Chrysler has already received one government rescue followed by the senior officer broadcasting an ad, &#039;If you can find a better car, buy it!&#039; It sounded so much like the grasshopper had learned something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Aesop&#8217;s &#8216;The Ant and the Grasshopper,&#8217; the grasshopper stuck to his dance and sing reflex until he went seeking a bailout. Sticking to it during the bailout request may indeed be breaking new ground.</p>
<p>It might be relevant to recall that Chrysler has already received one government rescue followed by the senior officer broadcasting an ad, &#8216;If you can find a better car, buy it!&#8217; It sounded so much like the grasshopper had learned something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veblen, phoenix, arizona</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>veblen, phoenix, arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>They obviously decided long ago that private planes are justified, and just didn&#039;t reconsider in light of this trip&#039;s purpose.

What&#039;s of far more concern, though, is that &lt;b&gt;these guys don&#039;t get that they&#039;ve screwed the pooch&lt;/b&gt;. (With the possible exception of Mullaly, who&#039;s only been at Ford for a year.)

These guys think they&#039;re doing a great job! That&#039;s why Chris Dodd&#039;s takedown was so fabulous.

Sure, if you&#039;re making your company billions, you shouldn&#039;t waste your time waiting for a delayed commercial flight in an airport where you can&#039;t discuss confidential information. &lt;b&gt;But if you&#039;re losing billions every quarter, then maybe your firm benefits from your being out of pocket.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They obviously decided long ago that private planes are justified, and just didn&#8217;t reconsider in light of this trip&#8217;s purpose.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s of far more concern, though, is that <b>these guys don&#8217;t get that they&#8217;ve screwed the pooch</b>. (With the possible exception of Mullaly, who&#8217;s only been at Ford for a year.)</p>
<p>These guys think they&#8217;re doing a great job! That&#8217;s why Chris Dodd&#8217;s takedown was so fabulous.</p>
<p>Sure, if you&#8217;re making your company billions, you shouldn&#8217;t waste your time waiting for a delayed commercial flight in an airport where you can&#8217;t discuss confidential information. <b>But if you&#8217;re losing billions every quarter, then maybe your firm benefits from your being out of pocket.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jackson - Austin, Texas</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jackson - Austin, Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8254</guid>
		<description>They have mastered their Executricks for sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have mastered their Executricks for sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Houma, LA</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Houma, LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8253</guid>
		<description>What happened to good ole teleconferencing?  I thought the point of high end projectors and fiber optics and massive computer servers was to facilitate the need to not be at a meeting in person if it wasn&#039;t in the same building?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to good ole teleconferencing?  I thought the point of high end projectors and fiber optics and massive computer servers was to facilitate the need to not be at a meeting in person if it wasn&#8217;t in the same building?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty Kim, NY,NY</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8252</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty Kim, NY,NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8252</guid>
		<description>If they went on one jet or used public transport (whats wrong with using the products they make?), how would they have found out who has a &quot;bigger&quot; one?

Betty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they went on one jet or used public transport (whats wrong with using the products they make?), how would they have found out who has a &#8220;bigger&#8221; one?</p>
<p>Betty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike, Spokane, WA</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike, Spokane, WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8250</guid>
		<description>Bing...a long long time ago, in a corporate galaxy far removed from our time, I was a young MBA graduate student.  Enrolled in a school of business, of not totally inconsequential note, I observed many perplexing (at the time anyway)logical inconsistencies.  

My undergraduate training was in the physical sciences.  The MBA pathway seemed the logical approach to financial success.  I found the course work rather unintimidating...its technical basis undemanding and shallow.  At certain points the MPA program (Masters in Public Adminstration)had a common nexus with the MBA curriculum....cost accounting tools...that sort of thing.  As an outsider to either discipline, I was struck with a consistent MBA emphasis on the glorification of individual competition at any cost. Real cheesy gladiator Gordon Gekko kind of stuff.

This was the era of Druckerian &#039;maximization of shareholder wealth&#039;, a practical theory that, at least in my humble opinion, has been distorted to epic, and unintendented, proportions (an analog to the abuse of the term &#039;enlightened self-interest&#039;).  The MBA student&#039;s approach was consistently self-focused...while the MPA approach had at least a modicum of societal concern. And no, I did not become a public &#039;administrator&#039; of any kind (so this post is not intended to be self-congratulatory).  Turds exist in both ranks.

In short, are we seeing the fully realized embodiment of such attitudes in the corporate sector?  Are the private jet transportation antics of the Detroit CEO business androids simply an obvious sign of the chasm that we have created through the worship of selfishness?

Bing, I apologize for any insults you may have suffered from my posts.  You have long been one of my favorite authors (you successfully bridge several worlds in a most entertaining fashion).  Your entertaining monograph regarding consultants remains one of my all time favorites.

In short, what are we going to do with this economic mess?  How do separate the wheat from the chaff?  Why does your blog give us such a pathetic little window to proof-read our entries so as to avoid looking like total asses?  I don&#039;t mind coming across as a total &#039;blood-eyed&#039; lunatic, but at least I&#039;d like to review my script in somewhat full text mode before posting.

Spokane says &#039;hello&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing&#8230;a long long time ago, in a corporate galaxy far removed from our time, I was a young MBA graduate student.  Enrolled in a school of business, of not totally inconsequential note, I observed many perplexing (at the time anyway)logical inconsistencies.  </p>
<p>My undergraduate training was in the physical sciences.  The MBA pathway seemed the logical approach to financial success.  I found the course work rather unintimidating&#8230;its technical basis undemanding and shallow.  At certain points the MPA program (Masters in Public Adminstration)had a common nexus with the MBA curriculum&#8230;.cost accounting tools&#8230;that sort of thing.  As an outsider to either discipline, I was struck with a consistent MBA emphasis on the glorification of individual competition at any cost. Real cheesy gladiator Gordon Gekko kind of stuff.</p>
<p>This was the era of Druckerian &#8216;maximization of shareholder wealth&#8217;, a practical theory that, at least in my humble opinion, has been distorted to epic, and unintendented, proportions (an analog to the abuse of the term &#8216;enlightened self-interest&#8217;).  The MBA student&#8217;s approach was consistently self-focused&#8230;while the MPA approach had at least a modicum of societal concern. And no, I did not become a public &#8216;administrator&#8217; of any kind (so this post is not intended to be self-congratulatory).  Turds exist in both ranks.</p>
<p>In short, are we seeing the fully realized embodiment of such attitudes in the corporate sector?  Are the private jet transportation antics of the Detroit CEO business androids simply an obvious sign of the chasm that we have created through the worship of selfishness?</p>
<p>Bing, I apologize for any insults you may have suffered from my posts.  You have long been one of my favorite authors (you successfully bridge several worlds in a most entertaining fashion).  Your entertaining monograph regarding consultants remains one of my all time favorites.</p>
<p>In short, what are we going to do with this economic mess?  How do separate the wheat from the chaff?  Why does your blog give us such a pathetic little window to proof-read our entries so as to avoid looking like total asses?  I don&#8217;t mind coming across as a total &#8216;blood-eyed&#8217; lunatic, but at least I&#8217;d like to review my script in somewhat full text mode before posting.</p>
<p>Spokane says &#8216;hello&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean, Westwood Hills, KS</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8249</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean, Westwood Hills, KS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8249</guid>
		<description>The devil is in the details.  That may actually be the whole ballgame.  They were not, and have, been paying attention to the world ... the one they have always thought revolved around them.  This mode of operation is catching up very quickly to them.  The private jet flights, which are quite common in the business world and have some logic to support it, are just a small glimpse of the thought pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The devil is in the details.  That may actually be the whole ballgame.  They were not, and have, been paying attention to the world &#8230; the one they have always thought revolved around them.  This mode of operation is catching up very quickly to them.  The private jet flights, which are quite common in the business world and have some logic to support it, are just a small glimpse of the thought pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert, Seattle</title>
		<link>http://stanleybing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/11/20/a-case-study-in-executive-stupidity/#comment-8248</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert, Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stanleybing.wordpress.com/?p=1756#comment-8248</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to imagine that someone could be become a captain of industry and also be stupid, but stranger things have happened in the history of man.

And while on the subject of imagination... think of the statement it would have made if these guys had carpooled down to DC from the Motor City?  Since they are big shots, nobody would have blinked an eye if they had a hired man do the driving.  It would also given them time together to come up with a good story to tell Congress and the American people.

Sadly, imaginations seems to be in about as short supply in Detroit as profits from car sales.

I quit my job back in April and though it hasn&#039;t been easy, I am now representing myself in the free market.  If I undercut the bloated prices of some of my former employers... well, that&#039;s just the market in action.

In my view, from the middle of society, if a person needs to find someone to blame for all of their troubles in the world, they only need look in the bathroom mirror.

Preferably under a harsh and unflattering fluorescent light.

It does wonders for putting it all in perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to imagine that someone could be become a captain of industry and also be stupid, but stranger things have happened in the history of man.</p>
<p>And while on the subject of imagination&#8230; think of the statement it would have made if these guys had carpooled down to DC from the Motor City?  Since they are big shots, nobody would have blinked an eye if they had a hired man do the driving.  It would also given them time together to come up with a good story to tell Congress and the American people.</p>
<p>Sadly, imaginations seems to be in about as short supply in Detroit as profits from car sales.</p>
<p>I quit my job back in April and though it hasn&#8217;t been easy, I am now representing myself in the free market.  If I undercut the bloated prices of some of my former employers&#8230; well, that&#8217;s just the market in action.</p>
<p>In my view, from the middle of society, if a person needs to find someone to blame for all of their troubles in the world, they only need look in the bathroom mirror.</p>
<p>Preferably under a harsh and unflattering fluorescent light.</p>
<p>It does wonders for putting it all in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
